[email protected] wrote:
> Hi
> I think year ago we talk about “read only chip” where operating system
> will be on read only chip and benefit of that.
> Right now I think it is imperative to go back to read only chip not to
> start computer faster but to solve a virus problem.
>   
I have a home network supported by a PC running Ubuntu. It has the 
standard Linux firewall on it.
People have found vulnerabilities in the web server and other software, 
and have made it do odd things like send spam. But, they haven't 
actually broken fully into the machine since about 2004 (on much older 
Linux software). Not for lack of trying, I used to get thousands of 
attempts a day. I put in an optional program denyhosts and set very 
restrictive tolerance on it, and it has cut down the number of attacks 
enormously. It looks for several failed login attempts on any account or 
TCP port, and puts the source IP address on the hosts.deny list, so they 
can't access the computer at all through any service. It basically 
detects hostile botnets and locks them out very quickly.

Anyway, I have never had the attackers get past the server/firewall and 
even attempt to do anything to the other machines in the local net. 
Since these machines have no WAN address, you have to compromise the 
server before you can even detect the local machines. I have NEVER seen 
anything like a true Windows virus on Linux. These botnets are directed 
by real people who send them on missions to crack into other machines, 
mostly to expand the botnet and use it for spamming or similar purposes.

Jon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to