About using MSDS as a reality test.. and evaluating magnitude of risk

I mentioned earlier about some potential risks that I don't know the 
'magnitude' of. MSDS sheets 
have to be taken as a grain of salt. I've read the MSDS sheet for laboratory 
sucrose - you would 
think it was dangerous, eye irritant, respiratory protections etc.. Getting 
good information about 
the MAGNITUDE of risks is hard - and MSDS don't seem very helpful.

The problem is that the Lawyers got involved - every possible conceived risk 
that could be 
consturued or misconstrued is listed so if they get sued they can say, "We 
warned them."

Safety warnings used to be helpful - now they are so exaggerated that the real 
safety issues are 
buried in pages of stupid stuff, to the point that people don't even read the 
warnings anymore.

I remember working 2nd shift in a hydraulic valve plant when I was in high 
school - hands in solvent 
all shift long - I realized that I could taste the solvent as it soaked into my 
skin - and insisted 
on using some gloves. Today, that job would require a hood, solvent proof 
smock, respirator, and in 
the end the job goes overseas where such details are less important than the 
opportunity to earn 
enough to stay fed.  There has to be a balance.

There is a risk to everything - (I think about the conversation I had with 
someone complaining about 
chemicals in their food - I pointed out that water is a chemical - the 
stuttering indignation and 
illogical thought processes it evoked is sadly typical. ) Chlorine in drinking 
water is a proven 
carcinogen, yet I want it in my water. (Some idiot talked some people into a 
"safer" UV system and 
ended up killing a bunch of people - I think in South America)

I think one of the worst examples of chemophobia has to do with lead. We know 
that the lead oxide 
that was used in paint is readily absorbed and toxic if ingested. Someone 
noticed that there was 
lead leaching from land fills and they banned lead from solder in the EU.

First, the lead coming out of land fills was from a different safety mandate - 
they put lead in CRT 
glass as an xray shield.

Next, where does lead come from? Lead ore in the ground is often in the oxide 
from which is smelted 
down to lead - (becomes safer (harder to absorb)). Then the lead is combined 
with tin (becomes safer 
yet). Then it gets buried again.

The use of non-lead solders in electronics has cost the industry billions of 
dollars and the 
electronics are now not as reliable. Safety systems are exempted, but because 
of availability, 
unleaded parts have ended up in everything. But even a cell phone failing 
during an emergency can 
result in death. The no-lead ban - instead of 'saving lives' - is costing 
lives. I wish the 
bureaucrats would listen to the engineers once in a while.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karl Schmidt                                  EMail k...@xtronics.com
Transtronics, Inc.                              WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th Street                             Ph (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049                              FAX (785) 841-0434

The lack of a middle class is a good indicator of how corrupt a government is.
kps

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to