Igor Chudov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Jon Elson <el...@pico-systems.com> wrote: > >> So, that is why I supply boards, but not turnkey systems. Some of my >> products are used by sizable aerospace shops in daily production. >> > > And your products are pretty good. Not the bottom of the barrel > cheapest, but very straightforward to use and time saving. > Yes, for any integrator, the first one takes some learning. But, if an integrator wanted to standardize on my products, the second machine would go like clockwork!
(I retrofitted a Series-II Boss 5 machine at Roland Freistad's shop in one day, including installing servo motors on it. It was not a finished retrofit, just nothing to 3 axis movement in one day.) That, of course, is true with any of the EMC2 interface products, or probably with Mach3 as well. Somebody really could go into business making kits for some specific (Iron) platform like Bridgeport BOSS retrofits. But, I never seem to get two requests for the same type of machine. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
