On Apr 7, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote: > Now that I know how easy it is, I may try a second approach, just > modifying 10_linux so that it differentiates between rtai- and non-rtai > linux kernels. [Although I'm not sure that's the answer for me because I > like being able to boot the rtai kernel without isolcpus=1 to see what > difference it makes on different boards.]
Personally, I would prefer adding my own just to keep it distinct from what already exists. > If I can get a moment tomorrow, I'll add what I've learned to the wiki > under Misc Stuff. Cool, please do! Please post the link to the wiki since I am not sure which wiki you are going to update - seems like where were a couple posted in this thread. > A question to you boot buffs. Does it make sense to include that > isolcpus=1 parameter in a recovery-mode entry for an rtai kernel? IMO, it is a noop since I (personally) wouldn't run in recovery mode. -Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
