On 6/11/2011 7:17 PM, Colin K wrote:
> The big thing stopping me from jumping in was the sense that you were lucky
> if you got a part one out of three runs on one of these things. It seems
> like the past year or two, things have improved a lot in terms of the
> extruder designs becoming somewhat reliable. I think their biggest problem
> these days is the motion control side. A few people have used EMC to run
> their RepRaps and seem to have gotten better results.
>
> This is just my .02c. Curious what others think.
I had a similar feeling, Colin, especially since, before I retired, I I 
had seem some commercial 3d-printed metal parts that a machinist-friend 
in another group had designed in SolidWorks. They were intended for a 
precision laboratory apparatus where the cost to produce them in-house 
would have been extravagant for the tolerances required on complex 
surfaces and the number of parts required.

Recently, however, I have been watching my 4 grandkids play with all 
manner of things and I have come to the conclusion that it's time to 
build a rapid-prototyping machine, even if I end up with parts having 
the form, fit and finish tolerances typical of the RepRap-class of 
machines.

These kids are getting to the age that they can design clever things 
on-screen (heck, my 8-year grandson revealed to me today that he is 
running the flight simulator in Google Earth 8 during downtime at 
school. I didn't even know GE8 contained a flight simulator!). Having a 
rapid prototyping machine on hand would mean they could immediately 
realize their designs. Even later, when and if they learn to use my 
bench-top machine tools, RP machines make many jobs easy that are just 
plain hard with drills, mills and lathes.

My past experiences tell me that quick feedback is the best way to 
foster improvements in design (and in thinking) and, to me, that's the 
whole point of RP machines.

I'd like to have that kind of capability for myself too, so I can 
prototype parts for robots. In many cases, extruded ABS or even PLA will 
do just fine even for the actual part. I can always follow up with 
traditional milled and turned parts when strength and/or finish 
requirements are stringent.

Regards,
Kent


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to