On 12.10.11 10:47, andy pugh wrote: > I have no idea who the network admin is, and EMC2 is most decidedly > not a part of my daily work, so it is actually difficult to think of a > reason to approach them without admitting that I use the web for non > work-related things.
The theoretical considerations going into the EMC2 control system could be quite useful background for your PID tweaking, I'd have thought? In extremis, discussing FF1 and FF2 in a loquacious manner, bordering on circumlocution, ought to cause the sysadmin to surrender, about the same time as his eyes glaze over, and his eyelids waver droopily. (As my brother says "Bullshit beats brains every time.", and he earns more than I do, with less formal education.) > I ought to be driving round in a car tuning a PID controller (one with > over 1000 numbers to get right (P, I and D are 3D-mapped to > speed/temperature/setpoint/error) A bit of research into PID-related and other control-system topics could potentially save several thousand-number tweaking iterations, in theory at least? Erik -- Westheimer's Discovery: A couple of months in the laboratory can frequently save a couple of hours in the library. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
