Am 23.01.2012 um 03:16 schrieb Scott Hasse: > I understand where you are coming from. Word order is not important as > long as you understand how things will be interpreted, and that > understanding matches what actually happens.
I think that point alone would make a pretty printer useful. During work on the interpreter I added about half a dozen of distinct execution phases to http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/gcode/overview.html#sec:Order-of-Execution by reading the code. It's now *26* phases for executing a block. There might be a genius out there who looks at a block and divines the execution order according to that list, and I'm not one of those. -- re tools: my past experience *) is mostly with yacc-type tools but looking around it seems there are few options for parser generators which are a) usable from c/c++ and Python and b) are maintained and widely used. ANTLR seems to support both c and python. sell me on it ;) is there a good non-Java, python and/or c++ parser example for a simple language so I understand what we'd be getting into? -Michael *;-) http://www.worldcat.org/title/task-sequencing-language-for-specifying-distributed-ada-systems-tsl-1/oclc/123326453 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
