On 1 May 2012 12:26, cogoman <cogo...@optimum.net> wrote: > I don't see how they could switch from 1/10 to full step without letting > LinuxCNC know, and having LinuxCNC reduce the number of steps being > sent, unless they used a clock multiplier, which would make it look like > full step to the control,
I imagine it is an internal clock-divider, so at high speed it full-steps every N input pulses, and at low speed it microsteps every input pulse. -- atp The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
