On 25.06.12 09:27, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> Today in spam folder I see "mail delivery failure", "undelivered mail
> returned" messages from different places. I can see in the text of the
> message the original sender, which has my domain after @ symbol (and
> different names before it, like Deanne021 or Victor812 etc).

...

> Does this mean that I have been hacked?

Probably not, is my guess. 

> Or can anyone simply fake the original sender entry and there is
> nothing I can do?

Yes and yes. When it has happened here, it has just been
backscatter <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backscatter_(e-mail)>

The sending of backscatter by the original spam victim achieves nothing,
but some sysadmins apparently still hope that there's one spammer in the
world sending with an honest "from" address. And, yes, sending
backscatter risks being blacklisted, because backscatter is secondary
spam.

Coming from the spam victim, the backscatter is invisible to the spammer
AIUI, so I can't see how it could serve to probe for active accounts at
your end. Even if it were the spammer sending a fake NDR (Non-Delivery
Response, or "bounce".), a competently configured MDA (Mail Delivery
Agent) would not respond to that, so the probe could only ever fail.

Checking for vulnerabilities can never hurt, but are any of us skilled
enough to do it well?

Good luck.

Erik

-- 
"I didn't marry him for his money, I divorced him for it."
                           - Seen on a wall plaque in a gift shop.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to