On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Bruce Layne <linux...@thinkingdevices.com>wrote:
> For me, that begs the question: "Is the user interface so burdensome > that the realtime operating system can't allocate top priority to the > realtime job and have enough left over for the user interface?" > The reason I am interested in doing this (sometimes) is not really for latency. A human doesn't really cause any problem for a real-time system. My thought is that packaging could be a lot better because nowadays you can mount a PC on the back of a monitor, feed it power and ethernet and be done. My obsolete desktop runs latency test just fine with 7uS of latency with the craziest loads I can put on it. I see no reason to worry about latency. I doubt I will run youtube on my mill that often, although my worst crash when I was trying to use Windows for machine control occurred because Bill Gates chose to check my email at an inopportune time. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
