On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 18:20 -0400, Matthew Herd wrote:
> I have an Atlas 7" shaper -- far superior to my 10" lathe.  It's almost 
> exclusively made of cast iron, and quite sturdy.  I enjoy using it to square 
> up workpieces as it is easy to use and sometimes programming MDI codes in the 
> mill just isn't worth the trouble for odd jobs.  I have been working on some 
> iron castings, and they have a tough outer skin.  The flycutter was driving 
> me mad, so I switched to the shaper.  Much easier!
> 
> As an aside, the viscosity of the Vactra #2 doesn't allow the clapper to move 
> perceptibly on all but the longest of strokes, especially in low speed.  Low 
> is WAY faster on mine than the one in the video.  I don't know about his 
> claim of slower feed for better surface finish, my experience is that tool 
> geometry has more to do with it than speed, but then again I have fairly 
> limited adjustments on that score!
> 
> One of the key features of a shaper is its ability, with the right 
> attachments, to cut true generated involute profiles for gears.  This is 
> possible with a mechanism, but is better accomplished with a CNC controlled 
> rotary axis.  It offers the advantages of hobbing with a single point tool 
> instead.  Entirely possible to make a gear of ANY number of teeth assuming 
> your single point tool has the correct pressure angle and tip radius for the 
> module/diametral pitch you are using.  The tool is then a simple triangular 
> tool with radius, rather than an involute profile.  Much easier to grind, and 
> could even be done on the bench grinder with a gauge of the proper angle, 
> just like threading tools!  Great flexibility in prototyping gears, but with 
> the downside that generating the gears takes FAR longer than hobbing.
> 
> As I see it, the shaper offers several advantages.  1) Ability to use HSS 
> tool bits to perform a wide range of jobs that milling machines could only do 
> with specialized tooling.  I.e. dovetails, T-slots, and many others I can't 
> think of off hand.  2) Internal keyways/splines/etc, which mills are 
> basically unable to do without a 'shaper' attachment.  3) Generated profiles 
> can be readily obtained (i.e. gears, as mentioned previously) with simple 
> attachments.  4) As mentioned, surface finish is excellent.  I haven't 
> perfected some of the tool geometries, but it can be nearly mirror without 
> much effort.
> 
> Disadvantages are 1) Can't shape a blind slot unless you drill out the end of 
> it first, 2) can't shape a pocket, at least not easily, 3) time.  The saying 
> goes "you can make anything with a shaper but money."
> 
> I would like to (someday) build a CNC shaper w/ rotary axis on the table 
> specifically for shaping prototype gears, splines, etc.  I wonder, though, 
> whether the idea of a rotary axis on the ram would be worthwhile.  If you 
> define the tool's geometry and have a rotary axis on the table, would you 
> really need the CNC control of the top slide angle?  The only problem with a 
> CNC shaper is that it requires a lot of adjustments (stroke length, stroke 
> position, top slide travel - if you have one, knee travel, cross travel, and 
> possibly rotary axis).  If you can bear to automate them all, then writing 
> the code may be a bit tricky.  If you can't, then you'd have make adjustments 
> between program segments.  Not dissimilar from tool changes, I suppose.
> 
> Matt

Hi all, 
I came very close to cnc-ing a shaper a few years ago. Take a look at
the side profile of the forward breechblock for a Starr rifle. Ideal for
a cnc'd shaper where Z (the tool) is locked to X (the cross-feed). I
finally gave up about half-way thru the project when the demand went
away. Part of this was driven by the realization that I could do most of
it with a vmc and cleanup the last bit with a file. The original block
still shows marks from the shaper tool. 

When horizontal mills became commonplace then a ground profile cutter
would have been used. 

Dave

Dave


> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to