Now I am mildly confused.  Looking straight at the sourceforge archive I
see no additional replies to my message (found a robot control on
Ebay...from earlier today).  The bottom of the page on sourceforge also
says "1 message has been excluded from this view by a project
administrator."

Of course, I'm not calling you a liar but rather calling my mail/list
readers into question.

Best,
Jason

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Jack Coats <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yep, along with the 16 replies to it.
> ><> ... Jack
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jason Burton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Thanks. Did the reply to my 100 watt servo amp thread go through?
> >
> > Best,
> > Jason
> >  On Nov 10, 2012 3:55 PM, "Jack Coats" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Not here.
> >> ><> ... Jack
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jason Burton <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Several times I've replied to what seem like recent enough topics to
> no
> >> > avail.
> >> >
> >> > The archive shows them as marked as spam.
> >> >
> >> > Just trying to understand the correct protocol.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to