On 04/02/2014 08:39 AM, Peter Blodow wrote:
>
> I don't even know what threading dials are and where they are installed,
> sorry. I usually cut a thread up to a given length, then stop and
> retract the tool in one instance. It's a two hand job. I can put the
> drive directly in reverse for a fraction of a second instead of a brake.
>
OK, this apparently is big difference between US and metric
practice.  US (and old British) lathes in the unified Imperial
system had standard threads that were all multiples of 8.
So, we had 20, 24, 32, 40 TPI.  You could disengage the
half nuts and re-engage on any thread for most of the
standard thread pitches.  For some odd pitches such as
pipe threads, you could only engage at one inch intervals.
The thread dial had various marks so you could be sure
to engage at the right multiple for the thread you are
cutting.  It is much faster to open the half nuts, back
up the carriage with the handwheel and re-engage
at the right mark on the dial.  I could usually do this
in about 2 seconds, including backing up the X and
feeding back in.  I'm sure reversing the spindle and
then going back to forwards would have to take longer.

But, with the various metric standard pitches, this
nice multiple relationship probably doesn't hold
for practical leadscrew pitches.

Jon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to