On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Marius Alksnys <[email protected]> wrote:
> I strongly disagree with you from two points of view: > 1. freedom - the component is great and it would be even greater with a > bit more freedom. > 2. In my opinion, control has to be fast and simple. And user / customer > is always right. At least almost. And when he brakes something due to > what he asked - let him decide, don't push. > > Instead of forcing user pushing step button 4 times every time he wants > to reduce the step, we could take some measures to make unintended > cycling to highest step harder or to be noted by sound, indicator, > vibration, etc. Or even use two buttons - one for increasing and one for > decreasing step size, without rollover. > > I configured this pendant before 2.6.0 was out and I made changes to .cc > file to invert stepsize direction. And the user was very happy till > 2.6.0 has overwritten my compiled component. > > One more question / idea is to let user select step sequence freely, I > mean instead of default: > > 1,10,100,1000 > something like: > 1000,200,50,10,1 > > Is this possible? Can pendant display any number in stepsize position? > Buttons? We don't need no steenkin' buttons! Increment, decrement, all on one knob. ;-) http://www.automationtechnologiesinc.com/products-page/mpgs/mpg2-pendant Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
