Greetings;

Someone on irc said touchoff gives a choice when you have entered the 
first number.  Not on 2.6.7, the only thing it says is radius, so I have 
to keep a pocket calc, to do a / 2.0000 on the size the caliper reads 
for the actual touchoff data entry. IOW, it takes radius inputs only.  
Putting X in diameter mode changes nothing in re this.

It seems to me I ought to be able to enter the diameter if I am running 
in that mode, or the radius if running in that mode.  But touch off, and 
the dro which does follow the touch off if you enter radius,it almost 
works.

I say almost, but the ending small end diameter is well oversized.
The scale factor on this x axis has been tested and verified several 
times.  But starting at 38mm diameter, and ending at 22.0000mm in 
diameter, the one cut I did today without it crashing, using a 

while [#<_x_tmp> gt #<_x_end>] (where #<_x_end> = 22.000000mm)

ended normlly at about 25.75mm in diameter, with half the expected 3/4" a 
foot taper.

So somethings all aglay.  And fighting with a touchoff that demands a 
radius regardless of the G7/G8 mode set is a prime distraction as it 
derails any train of analytical thought one might have when looking for 
the real problem. Frustrating even.

Thanks Guys.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to