2015-05-20 1:28 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Kuzminsky:

> > But they share no source code... OK, the PathPilot interface is
> > proprietary, but other source code of the fork should be available?
> That's
> > how GPL works, right?
>
> That *is* how GPL works, and Tormach is doing that.
>
> The new trajectory planner that's coming out in 2.7 was developed by
> Tormach and shared back with the community.
>
> It's my understanding that anyone who gets their PathPilot software can
> get a copy of the source code simply by asking them for it.
>
> I am no lawyer, but as i understand it this satisfies the requirements
> of the GPL.
>
> Of course, I know about the new TP. They contributed much to LinuxCNC,
particularly to this very important part. If it was not for Tormach, there
probably wouldn't be a new TP for a long time. I truly appreciate what
they're doing and I hope they will keep doing this.

As you say, they might use GPLv2 section 3b for the source code. And since
they distribute PathPilot interface as a part of (a whole) LinuxCNC, the
whole (and PathPilot as its part) should be licensed under GPL, as follows
from GPLv2 section 2.

I would prefer their fork in a public repository, that's all I'm saying. As
we all keep gaining from their contribution, they'd also gain from being
more open.

--
Andrew
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to