On 18 September 2015 at 22:38, Ron Ginger <rongin...@roadrunner.com> wrote: > I am not trying to push Mach on this list, I simply want the facts to be > clear and to try to kill off rumors.
Thanks for that. I don't actually understand why anyone thinks that LinuxCNC is in competition with Mach3. There is actually no advantage to LinuxCNC in having more market share, we don't make any more money, but we have a bigger (free) support burden. If people feel the need to justify their own choice by attacking Mach3 / 4 then that's up to them, but as long as people make the parts they want to make, then I don't care what they use. I do care when they take a servo/resolver Hardinge lathe and throw away all the top-spec original parts to run Mach, when it could work unmodified with LinuxCNC, but that's a very different reasoning. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
