Depending on your machine's acceleration, and the feed you requested, that
could be correct default behavior. The default blend tolerance is
unlimited. Given the speed limitations the TP used to have, it may not have
been able to go fast enough to need a big blend like that, so you might not
have seen it before. Does it still happen at lower feeds?

Another possible cause is a large maximum feed override, which causes the
TP to take larger blends. For example, a maximum feed override of 200%
means that at any time, the TP is prepared to go 2x your requested feed,
and doing so safely means a larger corner radius, even if your requested
feed isn't that fast.

In general, I would always recommend using an explicit tolerance for
blending.

Can you share a code snippet that leads to this behavior (also a config
file so I can see your max acceleration / velocity)?

Rob

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015, 7:33 PM Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:

> Greetings all;
>
> I was just forced to add a G64 P0.001 to my code for making the screw
> shank, a circular cut just deep enough to absorb the screw head, topped
> by a square cutout with 1/16" radius corners as left by a 1/8" mill run
> in a square pattern.  Without it, that square pocket was turned into a 1
> corner pointed circle!
>
> That sure seems like way too aggressive path blending to me.  I also
> noted that turning the alpha-blend checkbox on and off, had zero effect
> on the cut result. The initial white backplot trace was perfect, but not
> the wooden result when the code was executed, it was hugely, completely
> unusably bad.
>
> This is 2.7.0, updated Saturday IIRC.
>
> Is that the expected result?
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to