On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:31:54 -0500 Jeff Epler <jep...@unpythonic.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:50:07AM +0200, Karlsson & Wang wrote: > > Yes it works great! Do you think this should be part of standard behaviour? > > I talked to Seb about this change and we are uncomfortable putting it in > 2.7 since it is an unnecessary change for Mesa boards. > > However, I've prepared a branch > "(origin/)jepler/hm2-explicit-queue-write" which should be semantically > the same as the patch I offered earlier in this thread, which *you* > could merge to your own 2.7ish branch for your use and which I will > merge to our master branch if your testing produces a positive result. > > I reworked it slightly because the first version created *two* ways to > gather up reads (explicit and implicit); the new version gets rid of the > old implicit way. I did not test it on real hardware, I only > compile-tested it. > > Jeff Yes it is unnecessary change for Mesa boards but not the network. I am however very happy with a branch and will not complain. If periodic real time communication is taking place while configuring a card either configuration packets must have lower priority or dead lines may be missed. In practice this may be a problem at startup with Meas boards if real time communication start before all connected boards have been configured. Nicklas Karlsson ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
