Today, I was working on our twin spindle carving machine, and noticed that I 
was getting significantly different following errors on the W and Z axis. The 
axis are identical and so are the PID settings. Then I happened to check the 
pid errors. There the W and Z pid errors were the same. I scratched my head for 
a little while. I noticed that the W f-error seemed to be proportional to the 
velocity. I then went back and messed with the pid error-previous-target and 
found that if I set the pid error-previous-target to false for the W axis (all 
the others are true), then the axis.2.f-error and axis.8.f-error mostly 
matched. When I have the pid error-previous-target set to false for X, Y, or Z 
their f-errors become proportional to the velocity, but in the other direction. 
Any ideas what might be going on? 

-- 

======================================== 

Todd Zuercher 
mailto:zuerc...@embarqmail.com 

======================================== 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to