On Tuesday 31 May 2016 06:31:07 John Thornton wrote:

> I assume a 1/2" belt won't fit the spindle so have you tried the
> kevlar belts? McMaster 51514T315 <http://www.mcmaster.com/#51514T315>
>
> JT

That one is $23.62/copy in 3/8 by 70 cogs.  The one next to it called 
dust-free at $4.76 (1679K126) looks interesting.  And for some reason 
its cheaper than the regular fiberglass & neoprene XL ??

5 belts, 2 pulley's ordered.  The pulleys will need bored out for the 
bigger 1/2" shaft. Other than the time to setup and locate the center of 
the cogs, shrug.

> On 5/30/2016 8:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > For want of a better project to keep me out of the bars tonight, I
> > went out and extracted the stripped belt off the toy lathe just now,
> > find it well labeled as a 130XL037, 3/8" wide, 65 tooth belt.  It
> > appears that I had already replaced the ultra teeny drive pulley
> > that stripped the last belt easily had already been replaced with a
> > 15 tooth model.  So even with about 7 cogs fully engaged, this motor
> > still had the cojones to strip the teeth off the belt.  So I am
> > thinking out ordering a 140 or even a 150 (75 cogs) belt and a
> > bigger lower drive pulley which should get more cogs engaged.  That
> > will of course raise the spindle speed and probably make me run on
> > low backgear more often, but this motor has the cojones to do that
> > so I am not worried too much.
> >
> > So my question is, if I buy a 150 cog belt, and the existing lower
> > pulley has 16 cogs now, and I add 10 more to the belt, making it 75
> > it sounds as if I would need to add another 5 to the almost half
> > circle that would be engaging the belt on each side, so the 16 cog
> > pulley now would turn into a 26 if I want the center to center
> > distance to remain within say 2mm's of what it is now.  That seems
> > to me like if I tension it to about high C, that ought to be able to
> > survive that 1 hp motor long enough to at least finish one job,
> > bearing in mind there is a 3/1 stepdown between the motor, and the
> > shaft turning this lower pulley.
> >
> > Is my math somewhere near correct?  And would I be better off paying
> > the price of one of the white poly/kevlar belts as opposed to this
> > black one with a few strabds of kevlar in the backing and teeth that
> > look like a glass reenforced black rubber?  I'll check
> > McMaster-Carr, but I can get this belt for about $4/copy from the
> > prople that used to be GoodYear.
> >
> > Comments anybody?  Or did my mental math blow it, like its been
> > known to do several times before?
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network
> bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which
> users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides
> multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make
> informed decisions using capacity planning reports.
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to