On Tuesday 07 November 2017 07:48:13 andy pugh wrote:

> On 7 November 2017 at 12:43, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > They are not equal, not even close, measured at those pins on the
> > pid with the halscope. Ergo there should be an error at the pid's
> > error output pin even if its only a few microvolts.  Its a flat,
> > noiseless line on the scope. Even when the spindles rotation is
> > being reversed.
>
> Are you definitely looking at the right PID?
>
> Are you saying that you see non-zero PID output for zero error? That
> shouldn't be possible.
>
> What is the pid.N.maxerror?

I don't think its connected to anything, and ATM motor power is off, its 
quite early for me yet. I'll check later in the morning. But w/o motor 
power, error=command, and there is a pulse to 14 something or -14 
something dependent of which direction button I click on,on this 
pid.n.command-deriv. output with a 1.66667 input is limited by 
max.output but takes about 45 seconds to reach that 46.08, it keeps the 
pdm duty cycle from exceeding 98%. maxerror is zero even then. The 
saturated signal goes true and the saturated count advances when it 
reaches that limit.

Thanks Andy.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to