On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 4:37 PM Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote:

> Quite simplified, covers the basics but makes little or no mention of the
> resolvers speed limits. So in both cases, the encoder is king, and much
> cheaper to implement.
> I only have resolvers because I got them used, so encoders aren't always
cheaper.  STMBL reads resolvers. I have some motors I considered converting
to encoders, but that doesn't make sense now.  But resolvers have certainly
fallen out of favor from their peak. I'm sure they aren't going away.

I have some motors with three phase resolvers, apparently used for
commutation and position.
Eric Keller
Boalsburg, Pennsylvania
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Emc-users mailing list

Reply via email to