On Saturday 16 February 2019 06:47:58 Andy Pugh wrote:

> > On 16 Feb 2019, at 09:21, Erik Christiansen
> > <dva...@internode.on.net> wrote:
> >
> > as lb/in^2 isn't right
>
> It can be, if you measure oil consumption in slugs.
>
> We use hPa a lot at work. It annoys me.
> In fact the same software in various places uses hPa, kPa, MPa, bar,
> psi and inches of mercury!
>
And I sense a certain amount of marketting "if you can't dazzle them with 
brilliance, baffle them with bull shit" attitudes in quite a bit of this 
stuff.

Si standards for this stuff are nice, but theres way too many of them. 
Often using the exact same method to measure, but shifting the implied 
decimal points location. Particularly since the 'a' may be assumed to be 
one atmosphere, conveniently given a std value but fully capable of 
varying 25% according to the barometer and altitude in actual practice, 
at altitudes capable of supporting human life comfortably.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>



_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to