On 2020-02-15 01:05, Bari wrote:
On 2/15/20 1:42 AM, David Berndt wrote:
How did we get to the point where we decided that the goal is a
"relatively simple embedded system"? I for one am not looking to trade
off the current gui and it's features for what you describe.
It seems like a lot of this thread seems to steer itself in the
machinekit direction in terms of apparent goals/ideals, so I guess I'd
ask, why not start there?
We haven't. Someone just thinks new or different is better. Someone that
And you? You think that doing things the same old way is better? Steam
engine driving machines with pulley transmission in your work shop?
When I was little, we had to pull the weeds by bare hands on a small
farm. Our family would prefer doing it this way:
https://agerris.com/
https://farmwise.io/
https://www.deepfield-robotics.com/en/
Only people who think differently in a positive way make a positive
difference. Have you heard about little automobile company Tesla that
happens to be a bike ride from my home?
has not really worked much with CNC machines but does have an idea that
they think would make things better. It would be newer without
In my case, true. However I see what others with lots of $$$ in the
industry are doing. It would be beneficial for small shops or hobbyists
to use similar things on a smaller scale. No need for running test on
the motherboard to ensure RT kernel will work as expected.
That's how PC industry started in the 1970s. People started copying SW
and HW ideas from mainframes. I'm not inventing anything here. Just
pointing to possibility to simplify LinuxCNC and expand it's use.
explaining why it would be better, only telling us that it will be
better. So they think newer is better just because it is newer. I hope I
have cleared this up. :)
Explanation or hints were given by others and myself. For some it's
obvious, for others it's not. History is full of naysayers to everything
new.
Newer is better. Look into my eyes and repeat "newer is better".
Looking into your anonymous eyes:
Metric system is 200 years old. Some of us know it's better since my
grandma told me so long ago. Yet whole North American Continent is stuck
on archaic system that is based on dead British king finger, foot, and
butt size. So "newer is better".
"Make America Metric" I say.
Need explanation?
--
Rafael
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
