On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 09:10 +0100, andy pugh wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 04:14, John Dammeyer <jo...@autoartisans.com> > wrote: > > At the risk of being banned I'd suggest that this one point is a > > bit extreme: > > > > "Excessive or unwelcome helping; answering outside the scope of the > > question asked" > > It does seem a little odd. I suspect it is aimed at some manner of > behaviour that I have not (knowingly) seen on our forums. > It is a bit of a concern to think that I could be accused of breaking > the CoC for being too helpful. > > I get the feeling that this CoC was written for a somewhat different > demographic than LinuxCNC users tend to be. (By which I am mainly > referring to age) . >
I think this CoC leaves a lot to be desired. But can I suggest a very good one, one which I adopted in my own organization? https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/ Regards. _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
