On Monday, 7 March 2022 15:51:58 EST jeanfrancois wrote:
> Somewhere in the region of 5 US mils on a 50x50 mils region.
> 
> I can try work out a solution if you have a budget shall I be
> successful in the prototype.
> 
> Regards,
Thats pushing a $.50 micro switch according to some, but that is what I'm 
using on 4 machines, and I can do repeat homes based on the micro-switch 
to around .0003" inches. I don't know what you are doing, but an ex bro-
in-law used to quote that it was good enough for the girls he went with. 
:o)
> 
> 
> Jean-François
> 
> Le 07/03/2022 à 21:37, Thaddeus Waldner a écrit :
> > I need the small spot size of the measurement. I imagine US is not
> > that well defined.> 
> >> On Mar 7, 2022, at 2:32 PM, jeanfrancois <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Are ultrasonic sensors doing the job in that tolerance ?
> >> 
> >> Jean-François
> >> 
> >> Le 07/03/2022 à 21:01, gene heskett a écrit :
> >>> On Monday, 7 March 2022 12:44:21 EST Thaddeus Waldner wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> 
> >>>> I’m looking for a laser distance sensor with about 1-3 thousandths
> >>>> resolution and about a 5-10” working range. I wouldn’t mind buying
> >>>> a
> >>>> used unit.
> >>> 
> >>> 1. I didn't know they came in that high a resolution w/o needing a
> >>> quorum of the US Senate to authorize the payment, then signed by
> >>> the President.
> >>> 
> >>> If you want to know why, calculate the time difference of that 3
> >>> thousandths of an inch increment, remembering that it has to travel
> >>> out, and back to the measuring device, equal to C/2 in speed. You
> >>> will I suspect will come up with a very small fraction of a
> >>> picosecond.
> >>> 
> >>> Interferometry can measure that change, but the mod function to
> >>> detect
> >>> the individual null and count it has to start at zero, or a known
> >>> micron sized distance before it can count the nulls passing by as
> >>> it moves from zip distance, back to your point of interest at a
> >>> 12" max range. Moving slow enough to count, will take a 2048 bit
> >>> counter and several days.
> >>> 
> >>> Technically, we can do it but you'll need a couple of dump trucks
> >>> full of gold to finance one neasurement. We can't yet buy a
> >>> calibrated answer in 10 milliseconds for a $500 bill.  Someday?
> >>> Maybe, but it may take a new method to be invented.
> >>> 
> >>>> Does anyone here know of some brands/ models to check out?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Google has pointed me at some Acuity products but I wondered if
> >>>> there
> >>>> were other options besides that.
> >>>> 
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Emc-users mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Emc-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett.
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis





_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to