Eric,
Enumerator instances are expected to implement this interface, i.e.,
EEnumLiteral.getInstance returns such a value. You can't remove it. We
"hide" this from the public API in with this pattern. What exactly is
the API tool's complaint?
On 23/04/2013 9:12 PM, Eric Moffatt wrote:
We've been getting our API ready and Mike Rennie picked up on the
implementation of enums as having an apparently odd pattern;
The generated code 'implements Internal<x>' where <x> is the Feature
name and 'Internal<x>' is a package private interface that extends
org.eclipse.emf.common.util.Enumerator.
Could someone explain why the pattern is there and what the possible
consequences of removing it are (evidently it causes the API tooling
to complain, not sure why) ?
Thanks,
Eric
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
