Jorgen Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> To clarify, I'm suggesting that pressing RET on one of the streams >>> will just start playing that stream, keeping the current playlist. >>> (This means that no track in the playlist will be the current track. >>> I don't know if this is a major problem, but I suspect it might be.)
[...] > What do you expect `emms-next' to do when emms is playing a stream > that is not in the playlist? I expect that to start playing the next track in the playlist. That is, if your playlist looks like `A B C', B is currently playing, and you press RET on a stream, I expect `emms-previous' to start playing A, and `emms-next' to start playing C. In effect, the current track would be temporarily replaced when you press RET on a stream. I'm not sure whether this is actually a good idea. The multiple playlist stuff Lucas is talking about might be better, although I must admit I do not really understand it. :-) -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
