William XWL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The variable `emms-repeat-curr-track' was introduced less >> than a month ago. We already have `emms-repeat-playlist'. >> So how about renaming the former to `emms-repeat-track'? > > i prefer this one.
I think I prefer `emms-repeat-track' too, because it will cause any track to be repeated, no matter which is current when the variable is set. I don't think the `current' affix makes it any clearer. You could even argue for `emms-repeat-current-playlist', but I don't think it adds anything there either. It makes sense to have `current' in function names such as `emms-playlist-current-track', because function calls are made at individual points in time, which makes the concept of `current' meaningful. But Yoni said he prefers `emms-repeat-current-track', so I guess we'll wait for forcer to make the call. :-) By the way, Yoni, you don't have to CC messages to me; it's okay to send them just to the list. -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
