Angelina Carlton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yoni Rabkin Katzenell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Wow, I had no idea that playlist ever got that large. Sounds like a >> usage model in which the playlist is the central repository. I tend to >> keep everything on the disk and only load into Emms what I want to hear >> at the time. >> >> Still, I see no harm in getting an O(1) PBI into Emms! > > I load 90GB into EMMS every time I start X > (EMMS playlist)--L19802--C0--BOT > > It takes up all my CPU for 10 secs or so to load the files and then > again full cpu for a 15 secs or so to display the PBI > > I don't have a problem with that as I don't then log out of X for a few > days so its not inconvenient in any way. > > If you do change to a buffer, will that affect users like me who like > all the music loaded all the time? >
Not at all. As far as I understand it, the entire discussion is about making using very large playlists easier. Ideally every action the user performs on the playlist should take a given, constant and hopefully short amount of time regardless of the size of her playlist. -- "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice" _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
