Jorgen Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > William XWL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hi, all, >> >> I take some time looking into EMMS 2.0. Well, the improvements are >> pretty nice. Some ideas(such as merging `emms-player-extension.el' > into >> `emms.el') i used to wondering get done. >> >> When will we move up to EMMS 2.0 on savannah? so as to update each >> modules in accordance with changes. > > This is a good question. > > I quite distaste CVS, so I am also checking how well we can > support EMMS development with darcs only. But I'm not decided on > this subject yet.
Seems there are few differences between cvs and darcs. I'm okay with either, though i'm more familiar with cvs. But i wonder whether savannah supports darcs. > I don't think it's useful to move to Savannah before we have a > good replacement - a very central part of EMMS for many people, Yes... First time i was trying with EMMS 2.0, it wouldn't popup the playlist really gave me a big surprise. Still suffering with it... And this makes me think of putting EMMS 2.0 on savannah, since i think it's more comfortable to check out and commit with cvs, than sending mails in darcs currently. Do you run a darcs server? > the pbi, is still missing. If someone is brave enough to taste cvs, he should also prepare for the possible pains. :-) But this does be an essential point. > So I guess we can happily merge once that is done. > Also, the info stuff is not yet done. As I don't use ID3 stuff, > does the current info stuff work for emms 2? :-] If you were talking about info retrieval, i didn't find any wrong. emms-mode-line-string, playing time... all seem okay. -- William _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
