Yoni Rabkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From a bit of tinkering, it looks like the best way to tell if your
>> patch has been applied is to type "darcs send". If the patch shows up
>> there, it hasn't been applied. If it doesn't show up, it has been
>> applied.
>
> Finding out if they are applied is not the problem at all. As I said
> the question is if the patches arrived at all. If they have, have they
> been `rm'ed or are they just about to be applied. Until a patch is
> applied, they are in limbo. Which is not something that happens when
> using a centralised system.
The problem only happens when they're in "limbo". I reply to
patches I don't accept.
The biggest problem here is that I'm currently somewhat busy with
other things. Sorry for this.
> My solution is going to be not to let it bother me. Darcs is obviously
> a different way of working where repositories drift apart and
> occasionally connect.
Yes, indeed. Darcs works like that, and I think it's a good that
it does.
Greetings,
-- Jorgen
--
((email . "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") (www . "http://www.forcix.cx/";)
(gpg . "1024D/028AF63C") (irc . "nick forcer on IRCnet"))
_______________________________________________
Emms-help mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
