Jorgen Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> William Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Maybe emms-next-noerror is *not* "a good function to put in
>> `emms-player-finished-hook'." now? I suggest we directly call it after
>> emms-player-finished-hook?
>
> Hm. I'd want it to be customizable.
>
> Quick poll:
>
> `emms-player-next-hook' or `emms-player-next-function'?
`emms-player-next-function'. :-)
--
William
Sushido, n.:
The way of the tuna.
_______________________________________________
Emms-help mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
