>> Oh, yes. On [1] they say that it will be released this >> Friday. So maybe we can change the preambles (replace 2 with 3 >> should be enough, right?) till then, replace COPYING seconds >> after it's publicly available and release EMMS as the first >> package released under the GPLv3. > > I released my code under V2 or later, not under V3 only. I don't > think we should change the headers, our code will automatically > be licensed under V2 or V3 as soon as the license is officially > out, it will up to the users to choose which license fits best > their needs.
If Emms has been signed off to the FSF, we are not the copyright holders anymore. In a strictly legal sense, it is not our decision. I think that the consequence is that we can't keep Emms GPLv2-only in any case (not that I would want to). So what Lucas suggests is really the only option, that is, GPLv2-or-later. The FSF sent out a announcment about this just today that all GNU projects should switch to the GPLv3 when it is released. _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
