"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Alfred,
> May I suggest renaming it to emms-skip-amount or emms-skip-length ? > > That is fine by my. I think Michaels 'emms-seek-seconds' is even more clear, so we'll use that. > Once you're done renaming (or ignoring my request :) ), could you > use "darcs record ; darcs send" to send the patch ? It will send it > in the proper way to the proper list, where it will be properly > applied. > > I don't (or know how to) use darcs, sorry, and being swamped with work > sure doesn't help. :-) I'll do it for you. Bye and thanks for the contribution, Tassilo -- If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they restrict the use of these programs. (Richard M. Stallman) _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
