Hi Francis, counter question: Why not?
Private loggers give you more control over log the log configuration. Protected loggers are for lazy people, who don't want to declare a logger in every derived class. If you know for sure that you're not going to need a private logger in every derived class, why not make it protected in the base class? So it's a matter of taste - I personally decide from case to case. Regards Rainer Francis De Brabandere wrote: > re: non-private loggers? > > Why are some loggers protected instead of private? > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
