I'll be using the more correct way in the future. But I have to say that I don't always know when a vote is binding, is there explained somewhere for what kind of vote which kind of votes are binding or non-binding?
Francis On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Martijn Dashorst<martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Technically you're right, but even though sometimes we like red tape, > consensus based working is better. If a community is voting for > everything and doing everything according to red tape rules, it is not > working according to the Apache way. > > There's the absolute minimum decorum for official, binding events, such as: > - releases > - new committers > - new pmc members > > As far as I know, these are the official pieces where a vote is > required. How you write down the tally, is not too important, as long > as you keep track of binding and non-binding votes when it matters > (i.e. for the 3 topics a minimum of +3 binding votes is required). > When inside the incubator, the rules are the same, but the binding > votes are those of the Incubator PMC members, not the PPMC, which is > why it is adamant to have 3 mentors (they are your 3 binding votes) > > Everything else is self-inflicted red tape :) > > Martijn > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Rainer Döbele<doeb...@esteam.de> wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> the final result of our vote for using the Apache Nexus repositiory is: >> >> +1 votes: 3 >> 0 votes: 0 >> -1 votes: 0 >> >> The minimum requirement of 3 votes with no -1 votes has been meet. >> The proposal is hereby accepted. >> >> Regards >> Rainer >> >> >> @Francis: this is - as far as I know - the correct way to close a vote. >> >> >> >> Francis De Brabandere wrote: >>> Re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository? >>> >>> Vote closed: >>> >>> We have 3 positive votes an noboy voted against. >>> >>> I'll update the INFRA issue. >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Rainer Döbele<doeb...@esteam.de> >>> wrote: >>> > Hello everyone, >>> > >>> > Since we've got the three +1 votes required (Francis, Jörg and I), we >>> should consider closing the vote and tell the nexus guys to go ahead. >>> > >>> > BTW: I have now removed the "under construction" sign from our >>> Wikipedia page. >>> > >>> > Rainer >>> > >>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote: >>> >> re: Vote: Use Apache nexus repository? >>> >> >>> >> Since we are creating our first maven release and nexus makes this >>> >> process a lot simpler I would like to call a vote on this: >>> >> >>> >> see this jira issue where I added a subtask: >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896 >>> >> >>> >> As described in the issue, adding a subtask to that issue requires a >>> >> vote on the mailing list. >>> >> >>> >> More info here: >>> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html >>> >> http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html >>> >> >>> >> There is also the staging documentation in the Nexus book: >>> >> http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/staging.html >>> >> >>> >> [ ] yes, use nexus deployment >>> >> [ ] no, ... >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> http://www.somatik.be >>> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.somatik.be >>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >> > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
