Night. I got the javadoc in the dist now... I need to make some documentation on the release process!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Rainer Döbele<[email protected]> wrote: > Yep. I am off to bed now. Until tomorrow. > > Rainer > > Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> Re: Distribution >> >> on second thought, sources are handy for the examples >> >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Francis De >> Brabandere<[email protected]> wrote: >> > already fixed that inceptionyear in trunk, is 2008 ok? >> > >> > we can always link to the javadoc/src/jar from the site (link to >> maven >> > central repo) >> > >> > I think we need to think about who will download the distribution and >> > what they will expect but maybe we can tackle this in a next release? >> > Most people using maven will never download the distribution. They >> > will just add the artifacts in their pom or check out svn. >> > >> >> [INFO] Using Eclipse Workspace: null >> > I suppose this is not a problem, maybe null is the default workspace? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Francis >> > >> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Rainer Döbele<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Francis, >> >> >> >> Yes, the previous distribution (empire-db-2.0.4) contained the >> javadoc in the docs subdirectory. >> >> Personally I think it's not a must, but it won't hurt to provide it >> either. >> >> >> >> When I build the sources using "mvn clean install eclipse:eclipse" >> it's always coming up with an info saying "inceptionYear not specified, >> defaulting to 2009". Is this anything that's worth fixing? >> >> And I also get the message: "[INFO] Using Eclipse Workspace: null" >> which I don't know what it means. >> >> I guess this has been around for a while but I have just failed to >> notice so far. >> >> So if this is OK there is no reason to bother. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Rainer >> >> >> >> >> >> Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> >>> Re: Distribution >> >>> >> >>> did we have javadoc in the distribution before? >> >>> >> >>> I think the distribution is ok >> >>> >> >>> In fact the distribution is only for people not using maven, they >> have >> >>> sources and jar's. I don't think they'll be needing anything else? >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Rainer Döbele<[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > Thanks Francis, >> >>> > >> >>> > this is our first Maven based release so I nobody (probably) >> expects >> >>> everything to work at the first attempt. >> >>> > >> >>> > If there is anything I can do please let me know. >> >>> > >> >>> > Patiently waiting... >> >>> > Rainer >> >>> > >> >>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> >>> >> re: Distribution >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Dist build needs to be redone. Will take care of that. >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> http://www.somatik.be >> >>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > http://www.somatik.be >> > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.somatik.be >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
