Ok this evening I will send to private and general. On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Martijn Dashorst<[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Francis De > Brabandere<[email protected]> wrote: >> Why do we need the general@ mail if the >> mentors votes are enough? > > Because more eyes is better. The incubator PMC has delegated direct > oversight to the Mentors, but doesn't relinquish the oversight. The 3 > +1 votes from your mentors are the minimum required votes. However, 5 > -1 votes from IPMC members will negate our 3 +1 votes. And there are > many reasons why we mentors might +1 a release, but someone else will > -1 it. > > I usually look at the rat reports to see if there are no license > issues, and if due process was followed. But others will check for a > tag in svn, proper directory layout, unnecessary files in releases, > etc. There's a whole spectrum to look at, and while we do our best, we > can't catch everything. > > Martijn >
-- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
