Hi there,
so currently there are two main issues:
- relations
- handling database specific things
i'll have a look on the relations soon, as i don't know where to start
with handling the database specific things.
@ Francis:
>>I think it might be usefull to have addTable() on a DBDatabase. This
makes everything a bit more consistent in my eyes.
DBDatabase already has "addTable()" but by adding "addTable(String
table)" it would really be more consistent.
@ Rainer:
I agree to remove the static accessor in the in the generated database,
thus we make it a normal class instead of a singleton.
And about the two generic methods on the generated database class i'm
not sure what to do.
Splitting the codegen into a writer and a parser almost only using
DBDatabase objects was pretty straight forward. The only problem was
that they don't cover accessor/mutator names but that could be solved
with a additional ParserUtil class. Gladly it was even easier to
implement the nested column classes :).
best regard
benjamin
