Thanks Franics I have deleted and recreated the branch.
Rainer > from: Francis De Brabandere [mailto:[email protected]] > to: [email protected] > re: Re: start tackling EMPIREDB-99 > > Hi Rainer, > > I suggest you kill the branch and make a new one where you make the > changes, I think you are the best person to do this change. I've tried > a few times but kinda got stuck. > > Once the core module is updated I'm willing to help with the other > modules. > > Cheers, > Francis > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Rainer Döbele <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > during the last couple of months I had little spare time due to our 10 > years company anniversary that we celebrated last week. > > > > But now I really intend to tackle EMPIREDB-99 during the next few > weeks, which is the removal of the old-style error handling. > > I will start with the core, but once this is done I probably need some > help for the other modules. > > > > Basically I intend to remove all legacy code that is not necessary for > the current exception handling mode > (ErrorObject.setExceptionsEnabled(true)). > > Hence this choice will go. > > Consequently almost all method signatures with boolean return values > will be changed to "void" and it will not be possible to call hasError, > gerErrorInfo, getErrorMessage, ... on any Object. > > > > There is a branch set up for this in SVN (thanks Francis). > > @Francis: do you think it would make sense to update that branch > before I go ahead? > > > > Since this will be our biggest API change since incubation I am asking > everyone if there are further requirements and suggestions for > improvement. > > > > Regards > > Rainer > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
