----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
Hi,

Thanks Shu Lea for the invite to discuss 'publishing' as unfinished business.

I'm come into the discussion under the grouping of ' UNFINISHED publishing - 
Mute/MetaMute andNeural/Neural.it' and my new header of ' Open Climate 
Knowledge' might seem 'off-piste' but hopefully I can explain, or start an 
explanation.

My Mute/Metamute colleagues Pauline van Mourik Broekman and Josephine Berry are 
also taking part in this list session postings, so I'm sure we can bring up 
many threads of Mute's work - and there are many :-)

Part of my contribution to Mute and which is VERY unfinished business is 
'publishing systems/processes/and ways of doing things'. Mute constantly 
evolved its publishing medium/modes - web, newspaper, magazine, CMSs, Wikis, 
books, PoD, free to read, anti-copyright - and through these changes Mute grew 
and worked closely with many FOSS groups, systems, and platforms.

Personally I was working with these FOSS publishing systems in a McLuhanesque 
way 'the medium is the message/massage' that fascinated me and still does. Back 
then it might have been with platforms floating around at 'Wizards of OS' or 
'hacker events', now it is with a variety of non-platforms, anti-platforms, 
such as https://dokie.li/ - with the ambition to de-silo the world.

Work that was done with Mute I have now moved into academic and research 
publishing systems (medium) and this brings me to the 'Open Climate Knowledge' 
publishing project. It will come as no surprise to people that technically and 
socially scholarly publishing is very broken, or you could say UNFINISHED - no, 
that would be too kind.

With Peter Murray-Rust (PMR), a long time open access advocate, we have started 
an open collaboration to make climate change research publishing 100% open 
access - ASAP. Current rates are <30%, see: Bond-Lamberty, Ben, A. Peyton 
Smith, and Vanessa Bailey. ‘Running an Open Experiment: Transparency and 
Reproducibility in Soil and Ecosystem Science’. Environmental Research Letters 
11, no. 8 (29 July 2016): 084004. https://doi.org/10/gfb39g 

PMR has a data mining software framework that can search repositories to build 
up stats on open access (OA) rates in different sectors and you can do this too 
in your fields too - with repositories such as OpenPubMed, CrossRef, etc. With 
this knowledge base we will then consult and look to build a plan and 
recommendations about how to make the transition to full OA. See the framework 
here and if you have questions, post away or raise an issue: 
https://github.com/petermr/climate

And you can read more here 
https://genr.eu/wp/open-climate-knowledge-100-oa-for-climate-change/

To move to 100% OA for climate change we reject the current OA policies such as 
DEAL, Plan S, as these have the effect of continuing to exclude Global South 
researchers by further embedding high author fees (article processing charge - 
APC), - which could be 1.000-5.000€ per research article.

The are many other dimensions to 'publishing' questions and climate change and 
it is worth bringing in one more, in terms of what is accessible to 'the 
public'. A recent study shows how YouTube discriminates against climate 
sciences and makes it impossible to know what is in YouTube (there is no 
catalog) and there is no public knowledge of what is being viewed. See: 
Allgaier, Joachim. ‘Science and Environmental Communication on YouTube: 
Strategically Distorted Communications in Online Videos on Climate Change and 
Climate Engineering’. Frontiers in Communication 4 (2019). 
https://doi.org/10/gf8rst 

Open Climate Knowledge has only been out in the open for a few weeks, we're 
still getting things together and welcome all input, suggestions, comments, 
help, and critique.

Many thanks

Simon Worthington


--
Simon Worthington - Open Science Lab - http://tib.eu/osl
TIB – German National Library of Science and Technology
Welfengarten 1B, 30167 Hannover, Deutschland
+49 511 762-14691 [email protected] 
ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-9717 


_______________________________________________
empyre forum
[email protected]
http://empyre.library.cornell.edu

Reply via email to