Hi Patricia,

Is that piece from Becoming Undone? I'm writing an essay on ecocriticism and 
materialism and would dearly love to read it, as I am not a materialist either 
at this point, and it may be that there are some convergences. 

Yours, Tim



http://www.ecologywithoutnature.blogspot.com

On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:42 AM, "Clough, Patricia" <pclo...@gc.cuny.edu> wrote:

> Yes Grosz.    Wonderful piece by her  on why she no longer is a materialist   
>   Very beautiful  on matter and life.   Patricia 
> ________________________________________
> From: empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au 
> [empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au] On Behalf Of pinar yoldas 
> [p...@duke.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 9:36 PM
> To: soft_skinned_space
> Subject: Re: [-empyre-] Week 4 - Bio/Nano/Materialisms - the transperversal   
>   aesthetic of Texas grasshoppers
> 
> Thank you Heather,
> Your question "how do we think of the human reaching beyond the human?" is of 
> great importance to me.
> I want to quote Elizabeth Grosz here , who is a big influence for me and my 
> project .
> 
> "What is distinctively human in the humanities if man is again, in the light 
> of Darwin's rearrangement of the universe, placed in the context of animals 
> and animal-becomings?
> What would the humanities, a knowledge of the posthuman, be like far in the 
> future, after mankind has evolved beyond man? "
> 
> "What kind of new understanding of the humanities would it take to adequately 
> map this decentering that places man back within the animal, within nature, 
> and within a space and time that man does not regulate, understand, or 
> control? What new kinds of science does this entail? And what new kinds of 
> art? "
> 
> ( Grosz, Becoming Undone, p12)
> 
> Grosz  emphasizes Darwin's contribution in decentering of the human by 
> placing the animal right next to the human , not above, not below. The 
> nihilism Heather has pointed out is unavoidable at the moment of no-future 
> future and nanocaust. Yet Grosz' approach fills my lungs with fresh , 
> uncontaminated air, and a genetically modified desire to create rather than 
> annihilate.
> If human is not at the center anymore we can look at future as a pool of 
> animal possibilities. I personally strongly believe that the bio-nano realism 
> surrounding us can at least pave the way to post-human ecosystems where the 
> residues or 'cruft' of capitalism gives birth to new species , species beyond 
> capitalism, beyond military and maybe perhaps hopefully beyond religion.
> 
> 
> Pinar Yoldas
> -----------------------------------------------
> {artist, designer, neuroenthusiast}
> -----------------------------------------------
> PhD Student
> Art , Art History and Visual Studies
> Duke University
> -----------------------------------------------
> {http://pinaryoldas.info}
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 7:24 PM, Heather Davis wrote:
> 
> The no-future future is definitely something that lays heavy on me, as a 
> person and as a thinker, especially as it relates to what you call the 
> 'nanocaust' with its differential racial/class distributions over this earth. 
> it seems precisely at the level of the nano that these struggles are being 
> played out, within and outside of our own bodies, other living organisms, the 
> surface of the earth and the composition of water.
> 
> what i have been struggling with for a while is a desire to avoid the kind of 
> nihilism that would lead to a relishing in the terminal capitalism/empire 
> moment we seem to be finding ourselves in. beauty in pure destruction  is at 
> once a driver of social change and its expiration. This tendency, seen within 
> certain strands of SR (I am thinking of Nick Land/Reza Negarestani) has an 
> incredible appeal in its heightening of (nano) intensities, in maintaining 
> destruction as an important political concept, but seems to also slide 
> towards messianic end-of-the-world christian narratives of destruction and 
> perfection. is it possible or desirable to think with this material moment, 
> think with the dying cows, rapidly extinguishing species, without giving over 
> to the pure pleasure of annihilation?  how do we think of the collective as 
> necessarily reaching beyond the human, its transversal ontogenesis that 
> encompasses the object revenge that you speak of (especially in relation to 
> non-liv
 in
> g objects, such as chemicals, minerals, polymers, etc.) without falling into 
> a kind of christian rapture of the end times. perhaps this is for me where 
> art and theory provide a kind of breaking point/ambiguity that would enable a 
> different kind of movement. in other words, the anti-anti-utopian position of 
> art (through it's multiple negatives that leaves us where exactly?) provides 
> this kind of useful ambiguity that pushes in the direction of new organisms 
> (such as pinar's or ricardo's poetic nano-interventions)   operate as a 
> magical object, that is, the object that wards off the devil by becoming the 
> devil.
> 
> I really love Pinar's categorization of 'post-natural ecosystems' and Elle's 
> ethno-dysphoric cloning in this regard because this categorization offers a 
> way to acknowledge the destruction of capitalism while refusing the scenario 
> of apocalypse that gives too much weight to figures of origins and certainty. 
> thank you for these interventions.
> heather.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:57 AM, rrdominguez2 
> <rrdoming...@ucsd.edu<mailto:rrdoming...@ucsd.edu>> wrote:
> Hola Heather and all,
> 
> The transperversal movement(s) that *particle group* attempts to trace via 
> bio/nano scale(s) gestures may indeed call forth "a kind of material 
> corollary" of affect/effect. Elle's capturing the EEG of "ethno-dysphoric 
> cloning" or Pinar's new organ/ism pass and are passing between the utopian 
> synthetics of particle capitalism(s) and the nanocaust (or the revenge of the 
> object) - an apocalyptic materiality. The bio/nano aesthetic in the above 
> work moves within and around a critical anti-anti-utopian condition of making 
> these engines of imperceptibility visible - transperversal or a type of 
> queering movement.
> 
> But one does not have to look very far into the no-future future or the 
> freeze dried past to see what grey ecology of bio/nano is manifesting via 
> pre-set accidents or trans-effects at the bio/nano scale:
> 
> Genetically modified grass linked to cattle deaths
> http://wtvr.com/2012/06/24/genetically-modified-grass-linked-to-cattle-deaths/
> 
> Indeed a new materialism transmuting feed grass into poison which now only 
> Texas grasshoppers are enjoying (the transperversal moment).
> 
> As artists we are all Texas grasshoppers - but for how long?
> 
> Very best,
> Ricardo
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/24/12 5:27 PM, Heather Davis wrote:
> Hi all,
> Apologies for my tardy arrival. I am so excited to be a part of this 
> conversation with each of you, and find myself stunned by the quality of 
> thought and engagement of my brilliant interlocutors here. Thank you for your 
> contributions so for and to Zach and Micha for initiating and curating this 
> conversation. I am curious about the way in which the nano, in each of your 
> work, becomes a kind of significant imperceptibility. I am thinking about 
> how, in a previous discussion this month, the idea of 'queer is everywhere' 
> was broached. My initial reaction to this was a kind of doubt, not trusting 
> the utopic overtones, nor the amorphous quality of the statement that lacked 
> the dissensus that characterizes politics. What I appreciate about the nano, 
> in each of your works, Pinar, Ricardo, and Elle, is the way in which this 
> kind of utopic moment of the viral meets with an politics of imperceptibility 
> not as simply an aversion or counter-move to surveillant systems (of sex, the 
> state,
  n
> eoliberal corporate models, etc.) but as an imperceptibility that moves 
> through the body to make significant changes. It makes me wonder about the 
> nano as being a kind of material corollary of affect - that which carries a 
> force, but is seen through its effects, rather than in a chain of causes or 
> origins. this is indeed a queer position, a kind of passing that is important 
> in its movement, of what it touches and shifts, that is locatable in its 
> actions. the nano seems particularly adapted to this kind of effect, movement.
> 
> I cannot present here as beautiful a summary of the work that I am doing, as 
> it has yet to begin. Aside from dirt, which I love because of its 
> contaminating/contaminated qualities, because of its amorphousness and its 
> ability to be distinct while encompassing a range of materials, metaphors, 
> etc, I have become increasingly fascinated with plastic. It marks our current 
> age that is seemingly ubiquitous, unfathomable (in its scale, duration, 
> reach) and also makes the nano a human possibility. for it is only because of 
> the creation of purely synthetic polymers that we both have the ability to 
> manipulate things at a nanoscale, and are able to perceive the nano as a 
> separate measurable scale. I am interested in the way in which plastic, as a 
> medium, connects to a politics of imperceptibility.
> 
> heather.
> 
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Clough, Patricia 
> <pclo...@gc.cuny.edu<mailto:pclo...@gc.cuny.edu>> wrote:
> Thanks to all who engaged during week 3   and welcome week 4    Patricia
> ________________________________________
> From: 
> empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
>  
> [empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre-boun...@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>]
>  On Behalf Of Elle Mehrmand 
> [ellemehrm...@gmail.com<mailto:ellemehrm...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 8:43 PM
> To: empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
> Subject: [-empyre-] Week 4 - Bio/Nano/Materialisms
> 
> Hello out there,
> 
> I am honored to have this opportunity to neuro-jaculate on this list. The 
> notions of materialisms/ immaterialisms/ bio-materialisms/ -erialisms, within 
> the context of the bio-political, bring to mind the pixellated flesh of my 
> holographic/ fauxlographic clones who live in my most recent performative 
> installation entitled fauxlographic. For the past year I have been working 
> within the speculative space of an ethno-dysphoric cloning laboratory, where 
> diasporic anxiety is analyzed through the process of fauxlographic cloning. 
> The clones enact sonic rituals, singing in Farsi, English and Perz-ish [a 
> faux-ish language], based on multiple sources of information including 
> embodied memories, wikileaks cables, and textual/ visual/ aural references 
> concerning Iran and Persia. The ethno-dysphoric scientist analyzes her 
> dislocated subjectivity by performing a daily neurotic ritual within a glass 
> computing chamber while wearing an EEG neuro-headset. As she neuro-jaculates 
> with the clone
 s
> in order to (pars)e their data streams, the diasporic computing sounds of the 
> EEG oscillate in pitch based on her neural activity. When high levels of CO2 
> are detected by the lab's sensors, the clones become aware of those gazing 
> upon them, resulting in an anxious act of erasure and multiplication of their 
> pixellated flesh on the fauxlographic screen, reciprocating the affective 
> presence and implications of other bodies within the laboratory. The use of 
> organic sensors transforms the lab into a cyborgian spatial interface, 
> allowing for unconscious collaboration between multiple bodies in space, 
> confusing the somatic architecture of the performance.
> 
> // bodies
> 
> [fragmented.dislocated.flesh]
> 
> the metaphor of the split subject in a multitude of representations calls for 
> the split subjectivity of the diasporic body. the hologram. the clone. the 
> screenal flesh of the projection. the reflection on the glass. the live 
> specimen with a neural prosthetic.
> 
> //donna haraway's cyborg reconfigured
> 
> the live specimen lays in a burst of stillness within the glass chamber for 
> 30 minutes. the liveness of her naked body creates an affect that the clones 
> cannot produce, but ultimately she will become a reproduction of herself. she 
> performs analysis on the clones by means of neural computing. her experiments 
> are open to the public, allowing for multiple bodies to inhabit the 
> laboratory. the intersectionality of all of the bodies produce the organic 
> energy that is necessary for the installation to function.
> 
> the fauxlographic clones are fragmented and displaced as they interact with 
> their ironic head scarfs from american apparel through gestural research. the 
> black scarf cuts into their screenal skin, erasing their flesh due to the 
> translucent nature of the fauxlographic screen. they are never fully in or 
> out of the fabric, creating a fluidic relationship to the object, one that is 
> not part of a binary construct, but one that arises from a unique space 
> within the perception of being persian, and is expressed through the gestures 
> of their diasporic anxiety. fractured elements of their being are echoed in 
> the displacement of their body parts. they are vulnerable in their nudity 
> with their pixellated flesh and informatic contents exposed, but that is the 
> nature of the clone.
> 
> - elle mehrmand
> 
> --
> elleelleelle.org<http://elleelleelle.org/><http://elleelleelle.org<http://elleelleelle.org/>>
> assemblyofmazes.com<http://assemblyofmazes.com/><http://assemblyofmazes.com<http://assemblyofmazes.com/>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
> 
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au<mailto:empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
> 
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.subtle.net/empyre
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre

Reply via email to