----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
Sorry for previous blunder--wrong key pressed. But just a couple of things. As
the Benjamin essayhas been analyzed I feel like I should address some of the
thoughts on it.Mostly I agree with those thoughts, perhaps especially the final
paragraphwhere Heiner picks up on Benjamin’s opposition destroy/collect. I also
readthat in his essay. But—probably pointing out the obvious—that space between
theopposed terms is also important. Have we gone too far? is a question
that’sbeen asked on this listserv a number of times. Benjamin’s awareness of
theimportance of destroying brings that home, I think. Benjamin’s context in
partwas Lebensraum, and it could be in part ours today. Then also, one
destroyssomething in/by collecting. There’s the obvious destruction of an
environment(loosely speaking—any “place”) simply by picking up a stone, say,
andtransporting it to some collection. But also the destruction of putting
thingsunder lock and key as in “Enfer” sections. Destroying or blocking access
toinformation, knowledge. I think of Virginia Woolf lecturing to “working
class”women, informing them about venereal disease. That kind of modernity, a
commonreader modernity, seems to me to be a different kind of erasure (thanks,
Ana,for your gloss on that, new to me). My couple of things and apologies for
beingso hasty with this,, but (other) work calls. And thanks to Johannes for
thetranslation! Best wishes, William
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://empyre.library.cornell.edu
