> 2x is the expected amount.

Weird, I thought asm.js was optimized in firefox and it was faster.  I had 
also heard that FF had passed chrome in overall speed.  I guess you can't 
believe everything you read on the intertubes.

Unfortunately this thing I'm working on is proprietary and I can't show it. 
 

I'm not saying firefox is too slow to use.  I can optimize things in the C 
code and calling JS.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to