It definitely is; I suspect the different browsers are optimized better for different things. Ours actually runs about 20% faster on firefox than it does on Chrome, so it may just depend on what you're doing.
Richard On Apr 15, 2014, at 11:06, Mark Hahn <[email protected]> wrote: > > there is a *huge* performance difference between optimized and unoptimized > > asm.js interpreters. > > I started the thread before this one asking why FF was slower than chrome. > And this was with asm.js. Isn't FF optimized for asm.js? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
