Sphinx sounds interesting, thanks. The export options in particular (PDF, ePub) are appealing.
- Alon On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Mitchener <[email protected] > wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Alon Zakai <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> We are planning to start an overhaul of the emscripten documentation >> soon, that is, of the contents of the wiki on github. One option might be >> to move to Jekyll, which is convenient as it has good github integration. >> >> If you have any thoughts on the current docs and how they can be >> improved, let's discuss here. >> > > I really like working with Sphinx and ReStructured Text: > http://sphinx-doc.org/ > > I've used it (successfully) to produce thousands of pages of technical > documentation, encompassing multiple books. We publish these materials in > HTML, PDF and ePub. We've written our own extensions as needed and it has > been pretty easy. > > I can't say enough positive things about it and only have a few relatively > minor complaints. > > - Bruce > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
