Hi all, This doc shows the performance of pdfium.js and pdf.js:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s90JhBjpcbc8FoGruLFzKxaQ-cpKT8qmHgBUsCH9PXY/edit?usp=sharing The input file is the one used in the PDF.js demo (tracemonkey paper). And the test pages are http://coolwanglu.github.io/PDFium.js/ http://coolwanglu.github.io/PDFium.js/pdfjs.html I didn't use the PDF.js demo to avoid some overhead on UI. Also to be fair, text layer is disabled. In the figure we can see that PDFium.js with asm.js is very fast (except for page 9, no idea about the reason), the other two without asm.js were old versions, just for comparison. Alon: previously asm.js was disabled in order to allow memory growth, it actually makes much difference. regards, - Lu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
