There are still some outstanding questions on this plus I have a new one.
On 29/10/2014 11:46, Mark Callow wrote:
>
> ... I don't understand what you mean by "check the -L paths manually".
> In most compile/link tools following a search path and using default
> locations when nothing is found on them is a fundamental part of the
> linker's task. Why so averse to having emlink do this?
?
> ... How does -S USE_SDL=2 allow you to build dependencies?
?
>
> I agree that automatic downloads greatly raise the cost of a mistake
> in a -L specification. The solution is explicit downloading as
> suggested by Brion and following standard compile/link practices,
> instead of inventing something entirely new.
>
I want to clarify that this cost of a mistake is not a reason to use the
-S USE_SDL=2
>
> ... I thought libGLESv2 was built into the emsdk. Are you proposing
> making it subject to automagic downloading?
?
And the new question ...
In the emsdk 1.22.0 I am currently using, the existing SDL 1.x is
included in the generated .js file even though my app is not calling it.
Will this be changed? I'd hate to continue having both SDL 1.x and SDL 2
taking space.
Regards
-Mark
--
注意：この電子メールには、株式会社エイチアイの機密情報が含まれている場合
が有ります。正式なメール受信者では無い場合はメール複製、 再配信または情
報の使用を固く禁じております。エラー、手違いでこのメールを受け取られまし
たら削除を行い配信者にご連絡をお願いいたし ます.
NOTE: This electronic mail message may contain confidential and
privileged information from HI Corporation. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, photocopying, distribution or use of the
contents of the received information is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
permanently delete this message and all related copies.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
